MET 3020 Evaluation Form

Forecaster's Name:

Forecast Issue Date (Month Day Year):

Your Name (Optional)- include if you want the forecaster to know your identity:

Reviewer Number:
NOTE: Please answer all questions critically and honestly. 1 = Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3 = Average, 4=Good, 5 = Excellent
  1. Forecaster clearly identifies major feature(s) affecting the region.
    1 2 3 4 5

  2. Major weather features identified in #1 are clearly described as to how and to what extent they will affect local weather.
    1 2 3 4 5

  3. Forecaster's wording and explanations are such that the general public can understand.
    1 2 3 4 5

  4. Forecast includes all relevant variables, including any NWS watches and/or warnings.
    1 2 3 4 5

  5. Spoken forecast has good flow and pace. 0 = no phone message recorded.
    0 1 2 3 4 5

  6. Spoken forecast is engaging. 0 = no phone message recorded.
    0 1 2 3 4 5

  7. Overall communication of the main forecast message is effective.
    1 2 3 4 5

  8. Written forecast uses correct grammar and spelling.
    1 2 3 4 5

  9. Total points:
  10. How could this forecaster improve his or her forecast?

  11. What did you enjoy most about this forecast?

Please make sure you answered all questions.

last updated: 18 Aug 2008 16:18